DrivingEnthusiast
- Cars
- 1966 Honda S600
- 1980 Lotus Esprit with Ford SHO V-6 “SHOtus”
- 1993 Toyota Celica All-Trac
- 1999 Ford SVT Cobra
- 2000 Ford SVT Cobra R
- 2004 Saleen N2O Focus
- 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata NC
- 2006 Mazdaspeed6
- 2008 Honda S2000 CR
- 2008-2011 Dodge Challenger
- 2009 Nissan 370Z
- 2010 Ford Focus RS500
- 2011 Ford Mustang
- 2012 Mustang Boss 302
- Concepts
- Events & Places
- Drive: 2006.03.25 – Solstice Club Drive
- Drive: 2006.08.26 – Solstice Club Drive
- Drive: 2006.11.04 – Stonehenge II
- Drive: 2010.04.17 – Fort Smith, Arkansas, recreated for True Grit remake
- Event: Cars and Coffee (consolidated)
- Visit: 2007.10.31 – Munster House, Waxahachie TX
- Visit: 2008.05.17 – Lane Motor Museum Nashville TN
- Site Stats
- Contact Us
- About
Fast & Furious 5 – set pictures
Posted by DrivingEnthusiast in Car Movies on September 2, 2010
Pictures are starting to roll in from the the shooting of Fast and Furious part 5 – known as “Fast Five”. NSXPrime has the full story here, thanks to one of it’s members whose car was accepted for use in the film: http://www.nsxprime.com/forums/showthread.php?t=140331

This is a process we go thru with every installment of Fast & Furious. Pictures like this are probably being allowed to build hype and awareness for the movie. We’re a big fan of the F&F franchise… although we felt the storyline was even more ridiculous than usual in part 4. Part 2 was the worst of them, with Part 1 and Part 3 (set in Japan) the best. Lets hope they put some intelligence into this latest installment.
Look for Fast Five in June 2011, tentatively on the 10th.
Meanwhile, it’s a great time to collect and review the previous films. If you are new to the F&F series, you’ll need the background information and character history.

Ford releases more information on the all-electric 2012 Focus
Posted by DrivingEnthusiast in Ford Focus on September 2, 2010
Ford has released only minimal information on it’s upcoming all-electric Focus. Which is ordinarily the normal amount of information for a product that will launch over a year from now.
Compare this to Chevy, which has provided hundreds of press releases and many hours of video for the upcoming Volt, an unprecedented and deliberate campaign which started years before the Volt goes on sale at the end of 2010. It would appear that Chevy is out to win the battle for potential buyers of this entirely new type of car. What will Ford do to educate the buying public, then win their hearts and minds?
We know very little about Ford’s electric-only Focus, compared to the electric/gas Volt. We’ve followed the engineering, development, and testing of the Volt’s battery pack for the past two years or more and we know next to nothing about the pack which will be used in the Focus. What is Ford’s communication strategy here?
Perhaps Ford is trying to rectify this omission with the following press release. It discusses at the cooling system, which is a critical part of the engineering, and hints at the range – which handily tops that of the Volt when it’s running on electricity only. But on the other hand, the Volt carries a gasoline engine to recharge it’s batteries, allowing a total range of over 300 miles. When the Focus runs out of juice, it will end up on the side of the road. Two different strategies here, and Ford isn’t saying much about the differences.
Ford Press Release follows:
FORD USES INNOVATIVE LIQUID-COOLED BATTERY SYSTEM TO HELP FOCUS ELECTRIC OWNERS MAXIMIZE RANGE
- The all-new Ford Focus Electric, which debuts in late 2011 in the U.S. and 2012 in Europe, will be powered by a lithium-ion battery system that utilizes cooled and heated liquid to regulate battery temperature, extend battery life and maximize driving range
- The innovative thermal management technology helps the Focus Electric operate efficiently in a range of ambient temperatures
- Focus Electric is one of five new electrified vehicles Ford will deliver over the next three years in North America and Europe. The Focus Electric will be built at Ford’s retooled Michigan Assembly Plant
DEARBORN, Mich., Sept. 2, 2010 – The all-new Ford Focus Electric, which debuts in the U.S. late next year and in Europe in 2012, will be powered by an advanced lithium-ion battery that utilizes heated and cooled liquid to help maximize battery life and gas-free driving range.
Thermal management of lithium-ion battery systems is critical to the success of all-electric vehicles because extreme temperatures can affect performance, reliability, safety and durability. Ford has chosen an advanced active liquid-cooling and heating system to regulate the temperature of its lithium-ion battery packs, which are designed to operate under a range of ambient conditions.
“All-electric vehicles do not have a conventional engine on board, so it is critical we maximize the performance of the battery under various operating temperatures,” said Sherif Marakby, Ford director, Electrification Program and Engineering. “Active liquid systems are more effective than air systems at regulating lithium-ion battery temperature. As a result, the active liquid system on Focus Electric will play a key role in providing our customers with the best performance possible.”
The active liquid cooling and heating system also enables the Focus Electric to automatically precondition the battery pack temperature during daily recharging. When the vehicle is plugged in to the power grid, the vehicle system will be able to warm up the battery on cold days and cool it down on hot days.
The Focus Electric will be built at Ford’s retooled Michigan Assembly Plant and will be available in late 2011. The vehicle will have an expected range of up to 100 miles and use no gasoline at all.
Battery thermal management in action
While air-cooling methods work well for many of today’s smaller car battery systems, the larger, more complex lithium-ion battery technology powering Ford’s all-electric vehicles calls for an aggressive thermal management system.
An active liquid system heats or chills a coolant before pumping it through the battery cooling system. This loop regulates temperature throughout the system against external conditions.
On hot days, chilled water absorbs heat from the batteries, dispersing it through a radiator before pumping it through the chiller again. On cold days, heated water warms the batteries, gradually bringing the system’s temperature to a level that allows it to efficiently accept charge energy and provide enough discharge power for expected vehicle performance.
“Extreme temperatures impact a battery’s life and performance, making it crucial to have an effective cooling and heating system to regulate temperature for these demanding applications,” said Anand Sankaran, Ford executive technical leader, Energy Storage and HV Systems.
The liquid cooling system also plays a role in charging the vehicle. When the all-electric Focus is plugged in to recharge, the vehicle control system will automatically precondition the battery, if needed, to the optimal temperature before accepting charge. If the battery is already at the optimal temperature, the system will automatically accept charge and maintain an optimal temperature.
“We are working closely with our technology partners to accelerate the development of our lithium-ion battery systems to help our future EV customers get the most out of their vehicles,” Marakby said. “Our goal is to build an electric vehicle that delivers on the quality and performance customers have come to expect from Ford.”
Focus Electric is one of five electrified vehicles Ford will release over the next three years. In addition to the Focus Electric, the Ford Transit Connect Electric small commercial van arrives in late 2010, followed by two next-generation hybrid electric vehicles, as well as a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle in North America in 2012 and Europe in 2013.
Electrified vehicles are one part of Ford’s broader strategy to offer a wide range of environmentally friendly, advanced technology solutions to improve fuel economy and lower CO2 emissions affordably for customers around the world.
Austin Texas Formula 1 Track Design Revealed
Posted by DrivingEnthusiast in Formula 1 on September 1, 2010
AutoWeek has an article this morning covering the track design for the Austin Texas F1 track. Take a look below and imagine what the start will be with this kind of elevation change and the hard-left Turn 1!
With 133 feet of elevation change, this is a track we can’t wait to drive on ourselves. No word yet on opening the track to amateur events, and it’s certainly not a priority at this point in time. The clock is ticking to the big day in 2012 when the track opens for its first F1 event.
Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/20100901/F1/100909998

TTAC Fears the 2011 Mustang GT…?
Posted by DrivingEnthusiast in Coyote 5.0 Engine, Ford Mustang on August 31, 2010
TTAC today released an editorial titled “Do Not Buy A 2011 Mustang 5.0“: http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/editorial-do-not-buy-a-2011-mustang-5-0/ They claim to have discovered that Ford’s new 5 liter V-8 will get direct injection (D.I.) one day soon.
TTAC didn’t discover anything new at all.
Ford engineers already revealed that the engine and heads made “accommodation” for D.I. during the interviews they gave in the press rollout months ago. Several magazines were savvy enough to report it at the time as well as the fact that the 3.7 will also go to D.I. at a future point in time. And other engineers have publicly – although generally – discussed the overall rollout of D.I. inside Ford over the next several years.
Furthermore, reacting a few misinformed comments on their “editorial”: no, the reason the current 5 liter has port injection has absolutely nothing to do with somehow favoring the aftermarket or “drag racers”. That’s ridiculous. That’s not how business investment decisions are made or how Government mandates are met.
The decision to forego D.I. in this first iteration of the new 5 liter has solely to do with cost, and the new engine’s ability to meet its performance objectives (meaning emissions and fuel economy) without the extra cost of the D.I. hardware required.
When D.I. does get here some day, the engine will have even better drivability, as anybody knows who has owned a car with D.I. And better torque, HP, mileage, emissions, and A/F precision. D.I. is one of those technologies which do nothing but good. The engine will probably also get a compression ratio boost (note Mazda’s new D.I. 4 cylinders – featuring 13 and 14:1 compression!!) at the same time, which will improve torque even further.
As for the aftermarket, remember that the ’80s Mustang created the modern aftermarket, almost single handedly. And Mustang tuners have met and exceeded every single technology challenge handed to them – including Port Injection. When port injection came out in the Mustang (’84 SVO first, and the 4.9 liter V-8 in ’86) the fear mongers told everybody to “get a new Mustang before P.I. comes out”. Ridiculous then, very quickly disproven, and just as ridiculous now. We were there, with both an SVO and an ’86 GT. Our ’86 had fabulous drivability compared to the earlier ‘83-85 GT with its poorly tuned Holley carb, ridiculous A/C idle override, crude cold-weather start, and frequently blown diaphragms. Good riddance to that.
There’s lots more technology from Ford coming in the longer term, including variable valve lift – which is once again an emissions and mileage-driven change but which again will mean even more performance for us all. And when the next-gen Mustang comes out and hopefully drops a couple of hundred pounds (and adds the IRS), our world will get even better yet. And we know that at roughly the same time the Camaro will also move to a lighter platform, and make a switch to an all-new 5.5 liter OHV cam-phased direct-injected V-8. Time marches on.

Rogues Gallery: The Ruination Of The Hobby
Posted by DrivingEnthusiast in Automobilia, Automotive Humor on August 28, 2010
1) Aftermarket Embarrassment

Exhaust pipe spinners

Cross-drilled brake lines.

Hello Kitty exhaust tip
Fake scoops. A disease the Mustang is particularly susceptible to.

High-rise cowl hoods: with absolutely nothing underneath. Made for poseurs.

Dubs and scissor doors. One question - WHY? Next question - would you like to race me down the canyon?

Fake stick-on racing brake covers

Flame thrower conversion - note car already on fire
2) Flaming Idiots & Jerks

Yikes - what can we say?

Max Mosley: yikes, what can we say? He was a great leader? He put on a master race? He knew how to whip them into submission? Um... um... um...
Made political points for his political boss. Why do we put up with appointees like this?

Apt description of owner on license plate

Driver leaning on door with cellphone and thumbs-up grip on the steering wheel

Team 'em how to smoke 'em, just like Mom.

Spenser F. Katt: the well-equipped driver
3) Mediocre Crapola
Commie crap.. Just one example of everything that failed.
Volkswagen Beetle. The single worst car ever made. From which the brand will never recover.
Why Renault is no longer in the 1st world market
The worst sportscar design ever. With the engine in the absolute worst possible place.
Vega: rust bucket with a motor that consumes itself from the inside out
Cobalt. A recent leaked statement by their new head of product development asked how this piece of crap ever got out the door
Canyon/Colorado - the ugliest pickup truck in the world
4) When It’s Doomed

When the floorpan of your 1st car rusts out from under you - literally. And the gadawful rustbelt city you live in is at 20 degrees below zero!
"If it aint broke dont fix it". This is literally how your brand-focused car magazine explains in their yearly new-car issue the product methodology of a car that never significantly changes because the company doesnt invest any real money in it. In this example, for 15 model years.
Elitism - the single worst element of this hobby
5) Our favorite cars ruined (a)

The worst S2000 ever. Thank-you, Fast and Furious 2!
When they cancel their fabulous sportscar and replace it with this.
6) Our favorite cars ruined (b)

Incredible jerk that used to run SVT. When buyers ask why the new Mustang doesn't have an independent rear suspension, all he can say is (quote) “We’ll never appease those IRS snobs”. Thankfully he was shown the door and banished to South America where he can sell plenty of cars with oxcart rear suspensions.
Spyshot of secret Ford Mustang test vehicle - note VTEC technology licensed from Honda

Second worse aftermarket Mustang ever - for one of the worst TV shows ever. The Knight Rider franchise should have been left as it was.

The single worst aftermarket Mustang ever. What the heck were they thinking? Could you loan me a Ruger Blackhawk to put this thing out of its misery?
Thousands quit car hobby in acute embarrassment and disgust!
Posted by DrivingEnthusiast in Automobilia, Automotive Humor on August 28, 2010
CarLashes™ announces the newest and (what they feel is the) hottest automobile accessory of 2010: http://www.carlashes.com/
We are disgusted… we can no longer continue with this hobby if the road is full of cars wearing these. Reports are flooding the ‘net of driving enthusiasts selling their cars in droves…
Boats or airplanes might be the next hobby for us… or maybe just staying in the house and never coming out again.

We thought the flame-thrower exhaust kit was plain stupid… the Miss Kitty exhaust and the exhaust pipe spinners were both equally embarrassing. And don’t even bring up Bernie Ecclestone.
But this time the end has come… 2012 has arrived early for driving enthusiasts!
NAGTROC has the inside scoop on the revised 2012 Nissan GT-R
Posted by DrivingEnthusiast in Nissan GT-R on August 25, 2010
NAGTROC is the go-to source for all things GT-R. A new post on their site details Nissans changes to the GT-R for the new year, changes which are so significant that Nissan has changed the chassis code.
Read further: http://www.nagtroc.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=43310&st=0
Nissan is demonstrating the benefits of a continuous development methodology here – a lesson that very few automakers have learned. The changes are very significant and far-reaching, right up to an all-new rear wheel drive mode. The car itself is a 2012 model, so will be available next spring.
Stay tuned in the coming months for the production engine stats (now over 500 HP, with “significant” torque improvements) and performance numbers.

Jay Leno introduces the Boss 302 Laguna Seca
Posted by DrivingEnthusiast in Ford Mustang, Jay Leno on August 25, 2010
Jay Leno was at the introduction of the Boss 302 a few weeks back and now has the video of his visit with Tom Barnes, Vehicle Engineering Manager for the Mustang. There is only a little bit of new information here, but more importantly we get to hear how the Boss sounds.
M3 suffers embarrassment at the hands of the Mustang GT
Posted by DrivingEnthusiast in BMW, Ford Mustang on August 23, 2010
On-track tests reveal several issues for the M3, including a bout of understeer. While the M3 does post a tenth better lap time, the $25k difference is a problem. Nonetheless, as Motor Trend says, a win is a win.
Now imagine what the Mustang would do if it didn’t have the antiquated ox-cart axle. A modern IRS with anti-dive geometry and less unsprung weight would do wonders.
Yes, there is always the Boss 302. But then the BMW has a track model available, too.
And, saved here for posterity, are the specs of each car from Motor Trend. Note that the Mustang has essentially the same HP, and almost 100 lb-ft more torque. What should be an advantage (more torque, wider track) doesn’t yield as much as it should – again, the antique suspension is getting in the way, making for a nose heavy and light tail weight distribution. And, it can’t support the rear Brembos that the S197 development car with IRS was designed for.
| 2011 BMW M3 Coupe | 2011 Ford Mustang GT | |||
| POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS | ||||
| DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT | Front engine, RWD | Front engine, RWD | ||
| ENGINE TYPE | 90-deg V-8, aluminum block/heads | 90-deg V-8, aluminum block/heads | ||
| VALVETRAIN | DOHC, 4 valves/cyl | DOHC, 4 valves/cyl | ||
| DISPLACEMENT | 244.0 cu in/3999 cc | 302.1 cu in/4951 cc | ||
| COMPRESSION RATIO | 12.0:1 | 11.0:1 | ||
| POWER (SAE NET) | 414 hp @ 8300 rpm | 412 hp @ 6500 rpm | ||
| TORQUE (SAE NET) | 295 lb-ft @ 3900 rpm | 390 lb-ft @ 4250 rpm | ||
| REDLINE | 8300 rpm | 6800 rpm | ||
| WEIGHT TO POWER | 8.6 lb/hp | 8.8 lb/hp | ||
| TRANSMISSION | 6-speed manual | 6-speed manual | ||
| AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIO | 3.85:1/3.36:1 | 3.73:1/2.42:1 | ||
| SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR | Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar | Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar;live axle, coil springs,anti-roll bar | ||
| STEERING RATIO | 12.5:1 | 15.8:1 | ||
| TURNS, LOCK-TO-LOCK | 2.8 | 2.7 | ||
| BRAKES, F;R | 14.2-in vented disc;13.8-in vented disc, ABS | 14.0-in vented disc; 11.8-in vented disc, ABS | ||
| WHEELS, F;R | 9.0 x 19 in; 10.0 x 19 in,cast aluminum | 9.0 x 19 in,cast aluminum | ||
| TIRES, F;R | 245/35ZR19 93Y; 265/35ZR19 98Y ContinentalContiSportContact3 |
255/40R19; 255/40R19 Pirelli PZero | ||
| DIMENSIONS | ||||
| WHEELBASE | 108.7 in | 107.1 in | ||
| TRACK, F/R | 60.6/60.6 in | 62.3/62.9 in | ||
| LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT | 181.8 x 71.0 x 55.8 in | 188.1 x 73.9 x 55.8 in | ||
| TURNING CIRCLE | 38.4 ft | 36.7 ft | ||
| CURB WEIGHT | 3544 lb | 3616 lb | ||
| WEIGHT DIST, F/R | 51/49% | 55/45% | ||
| SEATING CAPACITY | 4 | 4 | ||
| HEADROOM, F/R | 38.4/36.8 in | 38.5/34.7 in | ||
| LEGROOM, F/R | 41.8/33.7 in | 42.4/29.8 in | ||
| SHOULDER ROOM, F/R | 55.3/51.9 in | 55.3/51.6 in | ||
| CARGO VOLUME | 11.0 cu ft | 13.4 cu ft | ||
| TEST DATA | ||||
| ACCELERATION TO MPH | ||||
| 0-30 | 1.7 sec | 1.7 sec | ||
| 0-40 | 2.4 | 2.6 | ||
| 0-50 | 3.4 | 3.3 | ||
| 0-60 | 4.4 | 4.4 | ||
| 0-70 | 5.6 | 5.5 | ||
| 0-80 | 7.1 | 6.8 | ||
| 0-90 | 8.7 | 8.4 | ||
| 0-100 | 10.3 | 10.1 | ||
| PASSING, 45-65 MPH | 1.9 | 2.1 | ||
| QUARTER MILE | 12.8 sec @ 110.9 mph | 12.7 sec @ 111.6 mph | ||
| BRAKING, 60-0 MPH | 110 ft | 108 ft | ||
| LATERAL ACCELERATION | 0.95 g (avg) | 0.96 g (avg) | ||
| MT FIGURE EIGHT | 25.1 sec @ 0.74 g (avg) | 24.9 sec @ 0.76 g (avg) | ||
| TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH | 2500 rpm | 1950 rpm | ||
| CONSUMER INFO | ||||
| BASE PRICE | $60,575 | $30,495 | ||
| PRICE AS TESTED | $67,025 | $40,275 | ||
| TRUE CAR TRUEVALUE PRICE* | $64,341 | $32,585 | ||
| STABILITY/TRACTION CONTROL | Yes/yes | Yes/yes | ||
| AIRBAGS | Dual front, front side, f/r curtain | Dual front, front side | ||
| BASIC WARRANTY | 4 yrs/50,000 miles | 3 yrs/36,000 miles | ||
| POWERTRAIN WARRANTY | 4 yrs/50,000 miles | 5 yrs/60,000 miles | ||
| ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE | 4 yrs/unlimited miles | 5 yrs/60,000 miles | ||
| FUEL CAPACITY | 16.6 gal | 16.0 gal | ||
| EPA CITY/HWY ECON | 14/20 mpg | 17/26 mpg | ||
| CO2 EMISSIONS | 1.20 lb/mile | 0.96 lb/mile | ||
| RECOMMENDED FUEL | Unleaded premium | Unleaded premium | ||
Read more: Motor Trend: Ford Mustang GT vs BMW M3 Comparison
And now the video, complete with Motor Trend’s own irritating ads:
This week’s dumb *** award
Posted by DrivingEnthusiast in Automobilia, Automotive Humor on August 20, 2010
This is exactly what you don’t want to happen when you have your car worked on!


