Now that the press is free to discuss their test drives of the Challenger last month, we get the full story about a miserably cold day at the Motorsport Ranch south of Fort Worth. What a coincidence, we were there the week before the press event and again just last weekend!
Follow the link above to AutoWeek and the full story.
Now here's the bad news: despite a wheelbase 4 inches shorter than a Charger, the car weights within 20 pounds of it at 4,140 pounds. With a very similar weight distribution of 55.6/44.4 fr/rr. That's why 425 horses only yields a 4.9 0-60. It takes that much HP to move this much car.
Compare and contrast to the porky Shelby with it's antique solid axle at 3980 pounds (coupe) and with 58.5% of it's weight over it's nose. Not only is it an antique, it has arthritis built in.
It will be interesting to see what the similarly-sized Camaro weighs! Like the Challenger, it will also have an IRS - although it will use struts up front. And, all of it's engines use aluminum blocks so figure on 150 pounds or more difference right there.
I can tell you without a doubt that the Challenger won't work on the roadcourse track. We've had Chargers and 300C SRT8s at events before and they just don't work - too large, too much mass, too heavy. But the Challenger is a handsome car, competent enough for quick street driving, and has appealing options. Veyr few will be made ultimately... and it's very hard to imagine much more HP coming down the road (undoubtledly the SRT engine will someday get the phased cam technology that the base "Hemi" will get in 2009). This would be a good buy now.