Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘Billy Ford’

24
Nov

CNBC: Rebuilding an American Icon

Interesting documentary on CNBC last night, tracking the return of Ford to the #1 position in American automobile manufacturers. And a special focus was Alan Mullaly, who is not only the face of Ford but the “driver” behind the comeback and revitalization.

We were however particularly irritated by the segment covering Bill Ford. CNBC seems to have missed the fact that Bill Ford was the one who caused the crisis in the first place. He thought he could run a company, he put himself in sole charge, he established the structure of the company, he drove the product plan, the buck stopped on his desk, and therefore he blew it. And he never admitted any role in the fall at all.

An important segment interviewed staffers from Consumer Reports, whose carefully tested statistics showed a serious quality drop at Ford earlier in the decade, then a major quality gain in the last two years. That matches our own experience with Ford products from that timeframe, particularly our 2003 Cobra with it’s POS engine that died due to a build error on the production line as well as inherent design flaws and lack of development testing.

And then we were introduced to Henry Ford III.  What are his qualifications, why is he even there and why is he ahead of anybody else? Sounds like a Ford Family ”legacy” is something like the infamous Kennedy legacy: you can’t seem to ever be rid of them; we (Ford and our country) can’t seem to get to a place where professional qualifications and abilities lead to promotions rather than Family “birthrights” and image “rehabilitation”.

The next segment covered India, and the tremendous opportunities there for growth. We were introduced to the new Ford Figo… which looks to us suspiciously like a past-generation Fiesta. Nonetheless, it literally means freedom and opportunity for middle class Indians.  No mention was made of the issues of dramatically increasing carbon dioxide emissions resulting from this growth. And while India is a huge growth market, it’s certainly not the only one. We think that Europe should have received due coverage for their terrific product accomplishments.

The segment on Sync was worrying… while Ford leads the way in Human Machine Interface (HMI) and is far ahead of the rest of the industry, the U.S. Government in the person of political appointee Ray LaHood is on a path to prohibit any and all cell phone access from the inside the car – even with hands-free. Whether LaHood can pull that off before his administration is run out of office remains to be seen.

The next segment covered the sad history of the Explorer, without specifically mentioning the issue of properly monitoring tire pressure and the resultant crashes. The issue was only covered as background for the development of new Explorer and it’s “curve control” technology. Nice technology - but it’s ultimately only a band-aid to the real problem. Hopefully the tire pressure monitoring systems required in all new cars will ensure that owners keep the tires inflated properly.

While several important aspects of the company’s failings and successes where glossed over or ignored, the facts remain that Ford is by far the most successful and forward-thinking of the Big Three. And admired: customers consistently recognize Ford for it’s successes and especially for not accepting bail-outs. But whether growth can continue in the longer term after Alan Mullaly retires and a new generation of leadership takes over, remains to be seen. The documentary also pointed out that this has been a cyclical problem starting with Henry Ford and repeating right up to the present.

Reference: Alan Mulally Bio

ALAN MULALLY

Title: President and CEO, Ford Motor Company

  • Joined Ford:  September 2006

Alan Mulally is president and chief executive officer of Ford Motor Company. He also is a member of the company’s Board of Directors.

Prior to joining Ford in September 2006, Mulally served as executive vice president of The Boeing Company, and president and chief executive officer of Boeing Commercial Airplanes.  In that role, he was responsible for all of the company’s commercial airplane programs and related services. Mulally also was a member of the Boeing Executive Council and served as Boeing’s senior executive in the Pacific Northwest.

Mulally was named Boeing’s president of Commercial Airplanes in September 1998. The responsibility of chief executive officer for the business unit was added in March 2001.

Previously, Mulally served as president of Boeing Information, Space & Defense Systems and senior vice president of The Boeing Company. Appointed to that role in February 1997, he was responsible for Boeing’s defense, space and government business.

Beginning in 1994, Mulally was senior vice president of Airplane Development for Boeing Commercial Airplanes Group, responsible for all airplane development activities, flight test operations, certification and government technical liaison. Earlier, Mulally served as Boeing’s vice president of Engineering, and as vice president and general manager of the 777 program.

Mulally joined Boeing in 1969 and progressed through a number of significant engineering and program-management assignments, including contributions on the 727, 737, 747, 757 and 767 airplanes.

Throughout his career, Mulally has been recognized for his contributions and industry leadership, including being named “Industry Leader of the Year” by Automotive News magazine, one of “The World’s Most Influential People” by TIME magazine, one of “The 30 Most Respected CEOs” by Barrons magazine, “Person of the Year” by Aviation Week magazine and one of “The Best Leaders” by BusinessWeek magazine.

Mulally serves on the President’s Export Council which was formed in 2010 to advise U.S. President Barack Obama on export enhancement and ways to encourage companies to increase exports and enter new markets.  He previously served as co-chair of the Washington Competitiveness Council, and sat on the advisory boards of NASA, the University of Washington, the University of Kansas, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the U.S. Air Force Scientific Advisory Board. He is a member of the United States National Academy of Engineering and a fellow of England’s Royal Academy of Engineering.

He also served as a past president of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) and is a former president of its Foundation. Additionally, Mulally served as a past chairman of the Board of Governors of the Aerospace Industries Association.

Mulally holds bachelor’s and master’s of science degrees in aeronautical and astronautical engineering from the University of Kansas, and earned a master’s in management from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as a 1982 Alfred P. Sloan fellow.

A native of Kansas, Mulally is a private pilot and enjoys tennis, golf and reading.

17
Apr

Thank You God: Bill Ford will never be CEO Again

Interesting and thought-provoking article in Automotive News this past week: http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100413/OEM02/304139975/1179 

However, they failed to take the time to ask a couple of simple questions about the short and abortive CEO term of Bill Ford himself. Billy himself does his best to make us not think of these things in his replies in the interview… but they do need to be asked.

- What happened to the product plan while he was CEO? While he was busy chopping away at everything and anything “Jacques Nasser” (including plans to bring European Fords to North America, and commonize platforms worldwide), plans fell behind, market share tumbled, and the focus (pun intended) of the company became very vague. Mercury all but disintegrated, and several other strategic projects such as Nasser’s plan for a small rear wheel drive chassis for Lincoln were killed off. Fortunately, Mr Nasser left Ford with fairly good Volvo and Mazda platforms that have provided a stop-gap (a very heavy and large stop-gap in the case of the Volvo chassis). Excluding ye olde Town Car (which Nasser planned to replace, and for which he sponsored smashingly brilliant concepts) and the Navigator (aka Expedition), the entire Lincoln line is either a Mazda or a Volvo. Compare that with the phenomenal progress that Cadillac has made. 

- Was the current financial crisis of Ford always a given, or with valid product would it have been mitigated or even non-existent? Granted there was a worldwide economic crisis not of Ford’s making, but how much would a viable and popular product line have mitigated that? If Ford North America had Ford of Europe’s last-gen products in it’s mix (as it is straining to do now with the next-gen European products), would Ford already have rolled over GM and Chrysler (and Toyota) and left them well behind? Remember that the European products are not just well received now, they have been for years and have undergone continuous improvement (an alien concept for North America). Ford has been gaining market share in Europe because of how well those products have been engineered.

- We question the claim of the the strength of the Ford family support. It’s been reported for years that the rest of the Ford family was extremely unhappy with little Billy’s management of their company, and it has been reported by some news outlets that the collective family fortune had shrunk to less than a quarter of it’s previous value. Some of us (this writer included) may have bought our Ford stock when it hit rock bottom and then recently sold it at a huge profit (this writer included), but the family had to sit by and watch their value disappear. And they maintained their faith in Billy’s management? Yea, sure.  

So, in our humble opinion, Automotive News let little Billy Ford off easy. The article “smells” like Ford’s PR department had a hand in it. Someday, if the right journalist comes along, and does thorough research and investigation, in our humble opinion we believe that we’ll see Billy Ford taking the majority of the blame for Ford’s crisis. And for the resulting crisis of tens of thousands of Ford workers whose careers, financial health, and sometimes even physical health, have been irreparably ruined.

We’ll give him some credit for looking for a new CEO, and Mulally was of course a brilliant choice. But the true story of how that one actually came about would also make a very worthy story – as would how Mulally deals with the Ford family. And what his fellow employees who aren’t named Ford think about the possibility of further Fords coming up thru the ranks based solely on their name and not on solid credentials and accomplishments earned the hard way.

Yes, we’re big fans of Ford the company, but even more so we’re fans of professional management and advancement that is earned by accomplishments and not as a “birth right”.

3
Apr

Billy Ford loses half the Family money

CNNMoney.comIn an article on CNNMoney, it’s revealed that little Billy Ford, the Ford family member who thought he shoudl be a CEO, is responsible for his family loosing half of the value of it’s Ford Motor Corporation stock. The situation is so bad they’re thinking about divesting into other businesses.


The family has lost $581 million dollars in value so far. The value of the stock in 2001 was $1.4 billion dollars. The big drop coincides with the moment in time that little Billy took over the company and in a fit cancelled all of Jacques Nassers product plans… leaving the North American operations with almost no new model pipeline and directly resulting in the loss of tens of thousands of jobs.


A needless, sad, and perhaps fatal state the company is struggling to overcome today. The direct reason for the tens-of-billions of dollars of loans, and the unprecedented step of having to mortgage the factories to back them up.


Given the strong & very competitive marketplace, the loss of the model pipeline is the bottom line:



  • The Lincoln folks would have had a next-gen Lincoln LS, a new (and beautiful) Continental flagship (leveraging a stretched next-gen LS chassis), and an entirely new BMW 3 series-sized platform for an entirely new product.
  • The Mercury folks were studying importing the Mondeo and we might have had that starting just now.
  • And of course the Ford Mustang wouldn’t have ended up as such a turd, Jacques would have made sure we had the IRS as well as the then-planned new “Hurricane” engine.

If I was the Ford Family, I’d be thinking about divesting ourselves of Billy.


More reading: CNNMoney: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/04/16/8404294/index.htm 

25
Jan

Billy Ford’s Legacy: 2006 net loss of $12.7 Billion Dollars

FORD MOTOR COMPANY REPORTS 2006 FOURTH-QUARTER AND FULL-YEAR RESULTS*






  • Full-year net loss of $12.7 billion, or $6.79 per share. Fourth-quarter net loss of $5.8 billion, or $3.05 per share.
  • Full-year after-tax loss from continuing operations of $2.8 billion, or $1.50 per share, excluding special items. Fourth-quarter after-tax loss from continuing operations of $2.1 billion, or $1.10 per share, excluding special items.**
  • Europe and South America were profitable for the full year, both improving on a year-over-year basis. North America, Premier Automotive Group and Asia Pacific and Africa reported full-year losses.
  • Financial Services, including Ford Motor Credit, earned a pre-tax full-year profit of more than $1.9 billion.
  • Automotive liquidity of $46 billion at year-end 2006 including credit facilities.

DEARBORN, Mich., Jan. 25, 2007

2
Dec

Billy Ford

* Minimal engineering investment, minimal durability testing (SVTs and Ford GTs you can’t drive hard without overheating)
* Maximum marketing the bejesus out of it (and you

25
Oct

The Truth About Cars: Bill Ford Spine Transplant

One of the the best sites on the web, The Truth About Cars, looks into a crystal ball and sees several press releases from the future. One concerns an experimental spine transplant for Billy Ford.


Source: The Truth About Cars


[Continue at link]

25
Oct

Billy Ford’s Disaster

… or the “disaster of Billy Ford” – take your choice. There is absolutely no excuse for this continuing disaster. Quarter after quarter of enormous losses, without an end on the horizon. 


Some people will blame the economy… some will blame the President. Both rediculous. Instead blame the man at the top – the one who put himself there solely because of “birthright” and not by being the best and most qualified person for the job. Not by being a person who worked his way to the top, he was only born there.


Of course Ford has an entire marketing research department that should have run the trends and predicted the shift away from enormous trucks. Did it indeed predict that? How could it not have? In my own career, I’ve worked in this type of group. All the numbers would have been there to show the trends.


Instead, the company (like GM and DhaimlerChryslter) was addicted to the profits from these trucks and brought more and more of them to market, instead of less and less. And whether the numbers were or were not available to point the way, the executive leadership still has to understand the market it’s working in, and be open to adjusting the strategy and setting the product plan.


And speaking of the product plan, look what a mess that is after the absolute rush by Billy to cancel all-things-Nasser. Which including cancelling a truly new Focus for North America (don’t think for even a second that the rebodied Focus coming next spring is even a tenth the car that the European Focus is), the Lincoln LS and Thunderbird platform, and a new smaller rear wheel drive platform for Lincoln. That platform would have come in especially useful for Lincoln to compete against Lexus (IS350 and GS350) and Infiniti (G35). And then there is the 4000-pound tub of a Mustang, which also would have benefitted from some sophistication (instead we have a gelded stallion, too big, heavy, and poorly suspended to be a true drivers car – one that the company could have used to show off its engineering prowess). Thank goodness there was the excellent Mazda and Volvo chassis to leverage (actually, thanks to Nasser!).


And now we have Alan Mulally, the new president and chief executive officer. Will he be able to operate on his own, or will the “guiding hand” of Billy Ford, as well as the rest of the Ford Family (with their special priveleged stock), be hovering in the background waiting to jump in and take over again? Even if the company becomes heathly again, that dark cloud will always be there.


Following is the press release with the bad news. Draw your own conclusion. Discuss.






FORD REPORTS PRELIMINARY 3Q 2006 FINANCIAL RESULTS*



  • Ford also announces plans to restate certain financial results to correct accounting under SFAS 133. The preliminary third-quarter results announced today do not reflect these corrections.
  • Third-quarter net loss of $5.8 billion, or $3.08 per share.
  • Loss from continuing operations, excluding special items, of $1.2 billion, or 62 cents per share.**
  • Strong liquidity with total cash, including automotive cash, marketable securities, loaned securities and short-term VEBA assets, of $23.6 billion.


DEARBORN, Mich., Oct. 23, 2006

25
Feb

Billy Ford….Executive of the Year?

Ford-Volvo-Bill_Ford-1-klein.jpg You have got to be kidding – Little Billy Ford as”Automotive Industry Executive of the Year”?


Business Week Online has a few things to say about this farce…


And, IMHO, we believe this “award” was part of his own PR and revival campaign. We see this in politics – and Hollywood – all the time.

10
Oct

Billy Ford: Report Card

Interesting article on Bill Ford written three years after the Nassar departure: http://www.fortune.com/fortune/ceo/articles/0,15114,650369,00.html. Also see the PowerPoint charts describing how Ford had alledgedly turned the company around after it fell (alledgedly due to under Nassar):  http://ospa.utdallas.edu/DrRedlinger/Ford-S05.pdf


But now, looking at his record a year and a half later, where are his accomplishments? Has he really accomplished anything at all? Ford has lost even more market share… replacement programs designed by Nassar for several major models were all cancelled solely because they were his (the Continental and Mark IX are two particular major losses, as was the Lincoln LS and T-Bird continuous improvement follow-ons). The ‘Vic and Town Car are aged and were due for replacement several years ago… even before they developed crash integrity problems.


The Fusion and Five Hundred have been heralded as the bread-and-butter saviors…. but where would Ford have been if the Mazda and Volvo (note: owned by Ford thanks to Nassar) platforms hadn’t been there to build them from?


The F-150 continues to get larger with every generation… the modular motor family stopped being state-of-the-art a while ago, and the upcoming Expedition replacements (now a Surburban competitor) are even larger than they were before. All of this directly contrary to his own environmental policies, policies which he had to move off to the side in order to keep the company afloat - at the mercy of selling ever more and ever larger trucks. In a slowing market.


And, speaking of small vehicles, the 3.5 DOHC engine is 2 years overdue… nevermind any versions of it above it’s initial 245-HP starter version (the replacement for the Porsche-designed 221-HP 3-liter V-6 that is now a bit dated). The replacement for the Focus was moved out, and the new Mustang is much larger and heavier than the old model… and almost as large as the ill-fated 71-73 models. And a stone-age suspension.


And then there is the Ford GT – the proclaimed “Pace Car of the Entire Company”. Never mind that the first several hundred are all wearing a diaper to prevent crankshaft leakage, and that approx. 16k had to be spent by Ford on each car replacing the suspension control arms and other parts. This is indeed the “Pace Car” of Ford.


All of this while the aged Taurus continues as top-ten a best seller. A car from another era, when Ford was well led.


Is this progress? What could we expect from somebody who had no business qualifications whatsoever?


Successes? Well, the Explorer gained an IRS and lost it’s evil handling in 2001. Thanks to Nassar. The Hybrid Escape is again a product of the Nassar era, when elements of the powertrain were first shown to the public in a Mondeo. The Mustang replacement was also approved way back then (although at the time it has the full DEW suspension w/SLA & IRS). SVT was charged by Nassar with building a range of sophisticated well-rounded cars, instead of today’s muscle-bound single product (not a favorite of the insurance companies, but definitely a favorite of the Arab oil shieks). SVT as we knew it then is gone today.


And in the last week we’ve learned that Bill Ford is looking for his own replacement. Very strange news, especially because it was so controversial that he took over in the first place… with the results being what we’ve now come to understand. Perhaps then this is his legacy… to know when to get out of the way, when to step down. Lets hope he is successful at this one last thing.;